![]()
CURRENT PROJECTS
Fluid Pressures, Solute Transport, and Fluid Budgets at Subduction Zones
Fluids, Heat Transport and the Strength of the San Andreas Fault
Hydrogeophysical Data "Fusion"
Hydrologic Impacts of Waters Co-Produced with Coal-Bed Methane
Imaging Flow and Transport in Shallow Fractured-Rock Aquifers
Instability & Collapse of Lava Domes and Volcano Flanks
Mechanical and Transport Properties of Fractures
Permeability Profiling with Cone Penetrometers
RESEARCH FACILITIES
Center for Quantitative Imaging
Along the San Andreas Fault in California, heat
flow observations and inferred stress orientations have been interpreted
to indicate that the fault is weak. The strength of plate boundary faults
is an important issue in understanding the balance of forces that affect
plate tectonics, earthquake mechanics, static stress transfer between
faults, rupture propagation and arrest, and aftershock activity. In
this context, understanding the strength of seismogenic plate boundary
faults like the San Andreas has emerged as a central issue in plate
boundary tectonics.
More recent work has questioned the interpretation of the mechanical
constraints - suggesting that the San Andreas fault may be strong after
all. Critics of the weak fault hypothesis have suggested that the fault
actually does generate frictional heat, but that groundwater flow, driven
by topographic relief, redistributes the heat. In this scenario, active
groundwater flow could hide the heat generated by a strong fault. The
idea of heat redistribution by topographically-driven groundwater flow
is attractive because there is considerable topography associated with
the fault itself - making all of the ingredients available for hiding
the thermal signature of a strong fault.
To test the hypothesis that groundwater flow might obscure the heat
generated by a strong fault, I (along with colleagues Barbara Bekins
and Steve Hickman at the U.S. Geological Survey) use a steady state,
2-D model of coupled heat and fluid flow within cross sections oriented
perpendicular to the fault and to the primary regional topography. We
studied two areas along the fault - the Parkfield area in Central CA
and the Mojave area in Southern CA. Both regions are well studied, with
lots of heat flow data to constrain the models. However, the two areas
differ in their seismic behavior, geology, and topographic relief.
Research on this topic is ongoing, and we have been funded by NSF to
study this problem in more detail.
Contact: Demian Saffer